Skip to main content
privacyDecember 13, 2025·9 min read

The Future of On-Chain Privacy

Exploring emerging trends in blockchain privacy: FHE, MPC, and next-generation ZK systems that will shape the future of confidential transactions.

R

Research Team

NixProtocol

Share:

Where privacy tech is heading

The tools we use today for blockchain privacy (encrypted balances, stealth addresses, ZK proofs) work. But there's a lot more coming down the pipeline. Some of it sounds like science fiction. Most of it will be production-ready within a few years.

Here's what we're paying attention to.

Fully homomorphic encryption (FHE)

This is the holy grail. FHE lets you do any computation on encrypted data without decrypting it first. Not just addition (which we can already do). Addition, multiplication, comparisons, loops, conditionals. Everything.

Think about what that means for smart contracts:

  • A DEX where orders stay encrypted until they match
  • Auctions where bids are sealed until the end
  • Lending protocols that evaluate collateral ratios on encrypted balances
  • Voting where the tally is computed without revealing individual votes

The catch? It's slow. Like, really slow. A simple operation that takes nanoseconds normally can take seconds with FHE. And the encrypted data is huge.

But it's getting better fast. Dedicated hardware is coming. The algorithms keep improving. Teams like Zama and Fhenix are building FHE-native blockchains. Give it a few years.

Multi-party computation (MPC)

MPC is different from FHE. Instead of one party encrypting data and computing on it, you split the data across multiple parties who compute together without any single party seeing the whole picture.

It's already used for:

  • Threshold wallets: Five people hold key shares, three are needed to sign, nobody ever has the complete key
  • Private matching: Dating apps that match without either party revealing preferences until there's a mutual match
  • Confidential benchmarking: Companies compare salaries or metrics without sharing raw data

For blockchain, this enables things like truly private order books where even the exchange operators can't see pending orders.

MPC is faster than FHE for many use cases, but it requires multiple parties to participate. Sometimes that's what you want. Sometimes it isn't.

Next-generation ZK systems

Zero-knowledge proofs are getting radically better.

Folding schemes (Nova, SuperNova) let you verify arbitrarily long computations with constant-size proofs. That's huge for rollups and complex privacy applications.

zkVMs (RISC Zero, SP1) let you write normal code in Rust or any language, compile it, and automatically generate ZK proofs of correct execution. No more hand-crafting circuits. This makes privacy features dramatically easier to build.

Faster provers keep cutting proof generation time. What took minutes now takes seconds. What took seconds is approaching real-time.

The trajectory is clear: ZK proofs are becoming cheap enough to use everywhere.

Ideas that are almost ready

Privacy pools: Vitalik's proposal where you prove your funds come from legitimate sources without revealing the specific source. You get privacy, but bad actors can't mix with your "clean" set. Smart way to balance privacy and compliance.

Cross-chain privacy: Right now, if you want privacy on Ethereum and Arbitrum, you need separate setups. Future systems will let you maintain one private identity across chains.

Time-locked revelation: Some things should be private now but public later (voting, sealed bids, embargoed announcements). Cryptographic time-locks make this work without trusting anyone to keep secrets.

The hard problems we still need to solve

Performance: Privacy costs more. Proofs take time to generate. Encrypted data is bigger. We can minimize this, but it won't be free.

Usability: Managing keys, scanning for transactions, recovering from lost devices. These are mostly solved problems in normal crypto but they get harder with privacy. We need better UX.

Regulation: Rules are still being written. Different countries, different rules. We need privacy systems that can adapt to various compliance requirements without being built for only one jurisdiction.

Quantum computing: Most current privacy cryptography breaks under sufficiently powerful quantum computers. They don't exist yet, but "harvest now, decrypt later" attacks mean we should migrate to post-quantum crypto sooner rather than later.

What we're working on

At NixProtocol, we're tracking all of this closely:

  • FHE experiments: Testing where partial FHE makes sense for specific features
  • Distributed keys: MPC-based key management for enterprise deployments
  • zkVM integration: Making it easier to build custom privacy features
  • Post-quantum prep: Hybrid schemes that work today but survive quantum computers

We're practical about this. We ship what works now. But we're also building in the flexibility to adopt better tech as it matures.

The future of on-chain privacy is coming together. We just have to build it.

Continue Reading

Explore more research articles on privacy infrastructure and zero-knowledge proofs.

View All Articles